Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 10:55:42
Message-Id: 52480720.7070704@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01 by Alan McKinnon
1 Am 29.09.2013 10:28, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
2 > On 29/09/2013 10:25, Mick wrote:
3 >> On Sunday 29 Sep 2013 06:29:37 Walter Dnes wrote:
4 >>> On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 06:09:40PM -0500, Dale wrote
5 >>>
6 >>>> Most likely, I'll install Kubuntu to start. Then I may roam around
7 >>>> and test other distros until I find one I like. Thing is, I already
8 >>>> have a starting point.
9 >>> I'm already looking. http://forums.funtoo.org/viewtopic.php?id=2265
10 >>> and they also dislike systemd. I think I could get to like it. See
11 >>> also http://bugs.funtoo.org/browse/FL-34
12 >> Very interesting! This looks as a logical way to put udev back in its
13 >> userspace box and stop it breaking the OS, or did I understand it incorrectly?
14 >>
15 > Exherbo might be worth a look too[1].
16 >
17 > It's a sort-of Gentoo fork using the portage tree and PMS; plus Ciaran
18 > strikes me as the kind of guy who *would* expend massive effort to find
19 > a way round current udev and systemd.
20 >
21 >
22 > [1] I didn't look myself. I have no idea what Exherbo's stance is on
23 > this matter.
24 >
25 >
26 >
27
28 why do you bring up udev and systemd AT ALL?
29
30 They are not the problem or the reason why seperate /usr is prone to break.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01 Greg Woodbury <redwolfe@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01 Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>