1 |
<SNIP> |
2 |
> |
3 |
> |
4 |
> So while rare, it's not just me. ;-) I've had cards fail by just plain |
5 |
> refusing not to mount at all, mounting read only and such. I've never |
6 |
> had one to fail like this tho. I guess if this was some sort of |
7 |
> sensitive files, I'd have to put it in a shredder or take a pair of |
8 |
> scissors to it. LOL |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I ordered 6 new cards as replacements. They came in yesterday. Like I |
11 |
> said, I wouldn't trust that card even if it started working again. So, |
12 |
> off to the trash the weird card goes. Now I just have to wonder why dd |
13 |
> and such didn't report problems. :/ |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Thanks to all for the info. Interesting. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Dale |
18 |
> |
19 |
> :-) :-) |
20 |
> |
21 |
|
22 |
Actually, it's possible that it failed this way by design. What if the |
23 |
card recognized that it's in some sort of a wear out condition and |
24 |
just shut off new writes? One might see it as a failure but a |
25 |
different view is as a potential opportunity to retrieve data before |
26 |
it's gone. |
27 |
|
28 |
You might want to check out this tool: |
29 |
|
30 |
https://github.com/BertoldVdb/sdtool |
31 |
|
32 |
which advertises that it can view, set and reset the write protection |
33 |
status of an SD card. Can't hurt if you're committed to throwing the |
34 |
device in the trash can anyway. (Well, it could possibly hose your |
35 |
system if you use it incorrectly or if it has bugs, but that's true |
36 |
about all software, right?) ;-) |
37 |
|
38 |
But at least you could view the status of the card. |
39 |
|
40 |
Cheers, |
41 |
Mark |