1 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 08:13:41 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>>> An alternative is to create a new volume group on the new disk and |
5 |
>>> mounts PVs at various points in your home directory. That way you get |
6 |
>>> the extra space and much of the flexibility without the risk of a |
7 |
>>> failure on a single drive taking out data on both. However, if you |
8 |
>>> are concerned about data loss, you should be using RAID at a minimum, |
9 |
>>> preferably with an error detecting filesystem. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> I've used that scheme myself in the past. You do get the increased space |
12 |
>> but you don't get much in the way of flexibility. And it get COMPLICATED |
13 |
>> really quickly. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> It certainly can, but for a simple two drive home system it shouldn't get |
16 |
> out of hand. However, it does avoid the "one disk errors kills two |
17 |
> disks' data" problem. |
18 |
|
19 |
Yea, right now, I'm only using two drives. One for the OS and one for |
20 |
/home. I have a third drive but it isn't in use. I'm thinking about |
21 |
moving everything but the videos to that drive, 750GB, and leave just |
22 |
the videos on the large 3TB drive. It'll free up a *little* space too. |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
>> To get around the situation of one drive almost full and the other |
28 |
>> having lots of space, folks often use symlinked directories, which you |
29 |
>> forget about and no-one else can figure out what you did... |
30 |
> |
31 |
> I wasn't suggesting symlinks, just LVs mounted at appropriate points. It |
32 |
> rather depends on the spread of Dale's data. If he just needs extra space |
33 |
> for his videos, he could get a new drive and mount it at ~/videos. |
34 |
|
35 |
The bulk of the space is used by the videos. It's everything from TV |
36 |
shows to movies to youtube howtos. I'm using roughly 1.8TB on the drive |
37 |
and the videos take up roughly 1.7TB of that space. My camera pics only |
38 |
use 21GBs of space. Rest is basically a rounding error. :/ |
39 |
|
40 |
> |
41 |
>> It all smacks of the old saw: |
42 |
>> |
43 |
>> For any non-trivial problem, there is always at least one solution that |
44 |
>> is simple, elegant, and wrong. |
45 |
> |
46 |
> :-) |
47 |
> |
48 |
> I consider what I suggested somewhat simple but far from elegant. Often |
49 |
> though, it's a lot less work in the long run to go for the initially more |
50 |
> complex solution. If Dale is worried about the likelihood of disk |
51 |
> failure, he really should be using RAID - either MDRAID under LVM or one |
52 |
> of the next-gen filesystems. |
53 |
> |
54 |
> |
55 |
|
56 |
I really do need to set up RAID at least for some stuff that I may not |
57 |
be able to get back. Some videos I have are no longer available. What |
58 |
I wish, I had a second puter in a outbuilding that I could copy to over |
59 |
ethernet or something. May help in the event of a house fire etc. |
60 |
|
61 |
Dale |
62 |
|
63 |
:-) :-) |