From: | Grant Taylor <gtaylor@×××××××××××××××××××××.net> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: HACK: Boot without an initramfs / initrd while maintaining a separate /usr file system. | ||
Date: | Tue, 06 Aug 2019 00:04:20 | ||
Message-Id: | 470901ba-87e5-7444-b9ba-4792080efa1b@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Re: HACK: Boot without an initramfs / initrd while maintaining a separate /usr file system. by Ian Zimmerman |
1 | On 8/5/19 5:52 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: |
2 | > Don't you have to go through some extra hoops (a flag to the mount |
3 | > command or something) to mount over a non-empty directory? |
4 | |
5 | Nope. |
6 | |
7 | I don't recall ever needing to do anything like that in Linux. |
8 | |
9 | I do know that other traditional Unixes are more picky about it. AIX |
10 | will refuse to use a populated directory as a mount point. |
11 | |
12 | As I type this, perhaps ZFS on Linux complains, but I don't recall. |
13 | |
14 | |
15 | |
16 | -- |
17 | Grant. . . . |
18 | unix || die |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: HACK: Boot without an initramfs / initrd while maintaining a separate /usr file system. | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |