| 1 |
Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon <at> gmail.com> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> On Saturday 29 March 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > I, too, know what it's like to receive a reply to one of my |
| 6 |
> > > questions which I find to be unhelpful and aggravating. However, |
| 7 |
> > > "two wrongs don't make a right" and no-one benefits from an angry |
| 8 |
> > > response. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Oh, so it's now my fault for responding to a flamebait? Nice. It's |
| 11 |
> > not the aggressor who's doing something wrong? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I started this, so I guess I have the right to make the following |
| 14 |
> request: |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Can we drop this sub-thread now, please? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Michael, I don't see how you could read my original post as flamebait. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
You don't see, how your KDE comment can be seen as a flamebait? Well, |
| 21 |
too bad. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> You were not supposed to respond, |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
You were not supposed to post such a comment in the first place. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> I did not intend you to take offence |
| 28 |
> and it was a harmless joke. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
If it was indeed supposed to be a joke, then it was a very bad |
| 31 |
one, especially as it was not visibile as a joke. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
> You have an answer and a solution that appears to suit you. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Not just me. As it turned out, the problem I had was due to a |
| 36 |
bug in the Gentoo rhythmbox-"2.20" package. It lacked proper |
| 37 |
dependencies. That is fixed in 2.22. Everything is fine. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
> That's a |
| 40 |
> good point to end this at. |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
Yes. |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
Michael |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
-- |
| 49 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives