1 |
· Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Sat, 10 May 2008 08:07:25 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> At least I wouldn't store everything in the same directory. It would |
6 |
>> of course be a good idea to seperate things. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> <sigh> When did I ever mention using a single directory to mix up all |
9 |
> backups? |
10 |
|
11 |
Never. And when did I say something like that? |
12 |
|
13 |
> All I did was answer a question with an example of when different OSes |
14 |
> may need to share a backup medium |
15 |
|
16 |
Correct. However you said, that "you need to access it (Linux backup |
17 |
directories) from Windows too". And that's the main point and the point |
18 |
that hasn't been answered yet: Why do you think, that such a need |
19 |
exists? |
20 |
|
21 |
On the contrary, I think that such a need absolutely does not exist |
22 |
and should be very much avoided. Reasons: |
23 |
|
24 |
- "DOS Filesystems" (fat, ntfs) don't allow to store all the metadata |
25 |
you find on Linux. |
26 |
- "Linux filesystems" (ext*, reiser, ...) don't allow to store all |
27 |
the metadata you find on Windows. |
28 |
- Sharing backup space means, that it get's used more often. This |
29 |
makes the risk larger, that something bad happens. |
30 |
|
31 |
And last, but not least: Why should backup directories be shared in |
32 |
the first place? |
33 |
|
34 |
>> And why do you make such a fuss about such a natural thing? There's |
35 |
>> just no reason in sharing such a device/filesystem/"storage endpoint" |
36 |
>> between different operating systems. |
37 |
> |
38 |
> Where did I state that a storage endpoint should be shared? |
39 |
|
40 |
<20080507160930.6e7b9b66@××××××××××××××××××××.uk>, Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 |
41 |
16:09:30 +0100 |
42 |
|
43 |
Michael Schmarck |
44 |
-- |
45 |
One advantage of talking to yourself is that you know at least somebody's |
46 |
listening. |
47 |
-- Franklin P. Jones |
48 |
|
49 |
|
50 |
-- |
51 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |