1 |
Michael, thanks, i know amd64 would be better, i used to had a |
2 |
multilib system, but for now i have a problem with java and 64-bit so |
3 |
i'm stuck on the 32-bit world for now =) |
4 |
|
5 |
Bruce, i see that, it looks like it's hardened indeed, i'll see what |
6 |
being hardened means and if it fits me, thank you. anyways i'd expect |
7 |
to also have a non hardened i686 stage 3... |
8 |
|
9 |
having a better look at things i can see this: |
10 |
http://gentoo.osuosl.org/releases/x86/autobuilds/20130305/default/20130305/ |
11 |
which has an i686 stage 3. i wonder what changed recently... |
12 |
i guess i'll go with it for now and just update it... |
13 |
|
14 |
D |
15 |
|
16 |
2013/4/2 Bruce Hill <daddy@×××××××××××××××××××××.com>: |
17 |
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 07:51:17PM +0200, Davide Carnovale wrote: |
18 |
>> Hi all gentoo people! |
19 |
>> I've been away from gentoo for a while, and I'm in the process of |
20 |
>> reinstalling it today. |
21 |
>> While downloading the stage 3 I noticed that only an i486 version is |
22 |
>> available. As far as I remember, gentoo was best known, back in the |
23 |
>> days, for being fast, as it was one of the first distro to support |
24 |
>> i686... am i wrong with this? if not, why only i486 today? |
25 |
>> |
26 |
>> apart from the reasons behind the decision of shipping only an i486 |
27 |
>> stage 3, do you think it's worth the pain to recompile everything |
28 |
>> (like the old stage1) for a different arch? i have an intel i5 |
29 |
>> processor. |
30 |
>> |
31 |
>> regards |
32 |
>> |
33 |
>> Davide |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Hi Davide, |
36 |
> |
37 |
> The directories I checked read: |
38 |
> http://gentoo.osuosl.org/releases/x86/autobuilds/current-stage3-i686/ |
39 |
> but the tarball states it's hardened: |
40 |
> http://gentoo.osuosl.org/releases/x86/autobuilds/current-stage3-i686/stage3-i686-hardened-20130326.tar.bz2 |
41 |
> |
42 |
> Haven't personally used a x86 in years. |
43 |
> -- |
44 |
> Happy Penguin Computers >') |
45 |
> 126 Fenco Drive ( \ |
46 |
> Tupelo, MS 38801 ^^ |
47 |
> support@×××××××××××××××××××××.com |
48 |
> 662-269-2706 662-205-6424 |
49 |
> http://happypenguincomputers.com/ |
50 |
> |
51 |
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. |
52 |
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? |
53 |
> A: Top-posting. |
54 |
> Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? |
55 |
> |
56 |
> Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting |
57 |
> |