1 |
I was updating my AMD64 system last night - which has an nVidia card and uses |
2 |
the nVidia binary stack - and ran into problems. jasper won't compile with |
3 |
nVidia's provide opengl implementation. But bug report[1] notes suggest the |
4 |
problem is in nVidia's binary layer and all the crap the replace. I had to |
5 |
switch it over to the standard X11 opengl to compile it. I'll switch it back |
6 |
later, but there are serious problems with the nVidia binary stack that way. |
7 |
|
8 |
My point is that in using the binary drivers you are laden to the card supports |
9 |
they choose, and you will eventually end up using the open source drivers once |
10 |
they decide it is no longer worth their effort to support the card. This holds |
11 |
true for both nVidia and ATI. |
12 |
|
13 |
Ben |
14 |
|
15 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133609 |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
> |
19 |
>From: App Deb <appdebgr@×××××.com> |
20 |
>To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
21 |
>Sent: Tue, July 27, 2010 5:16:46 PM |
22 |
>Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: State of Radeon drivers |
23 |
> |
24 |
>Nvidia's binary can't be compared to ATI's one. The problems you describe are |
25 |
>ATI-binary specific. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> |
28 |
>And yes the nvidia binary replaces a lot of Xorg stuff, but after some time you |
29 |
>will realise that this is a good thing, as the Xorg is a mess, breaks with |
30 |
>updates, and introduces bugs with each release. And because developers know |
31 |
>that, they always prepare their software for nvidia, as it is the only *serious* |
32 |
>graphics solution for *nix right now. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> |
35 |
>Don't get me wrong, I don't even have an nvidia card in my systems right now |
36 |
>(cause ATI are superior in windows, all my systems have ATI), but I miss the |
37 |
>times that I had one. So much more stuff worked without problems and with better |
38 |
>performance. |
39 |
> |
40 |
> |
41 |
>On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 4:42 PM, BRM <bm_witness@×××××.com> wrote: |
42 |
> |
43 |
>That's great so long as nVidia supports your card. The problem with the binary |
44 |
>drivers is that they typically only support a percentage of all the cards the |
45 |
>video maker makes. |
46 |
>>For example, I can't use the ATI binary driver on my laptop since it no longer |
47 |
>>supports the R250 chipset, only their latest 3 or 4 generations of cards. So I |
48 |
>>have to use the OSS driver, which works great with it. |
49 |
>>I have been able to use both the OSS and proprietary drivers on my desktop with |
50 |
>>an nVidia card, but I don't know how much longer that will last. |
51 |
>> |
52 |
>>nVidia's proprietary driver is good namely because it is the same at the core as |
53 |
>>on Windows and Mac, and they wrap it to make it work with the *nix kernels. |
54 |
>>However, they also do a lot of other funky stuff and keep people from being able |
55 |
>>to fully use the full extend of X. Just search this list (among others) for |
56 |
>>xRanderer and other components of X and you'll see the full story of nVidia's |
57 |
>>proprietary driver. |
58 |
>> |
59 |
>>Ben |
60 |
>> |
61 |
>> |
62 |
>>> |
63 |
>>>From: App Deb <appdebgr@×××××.com> |
64 |
>>>To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
65 |
>>>Sent: Tue, July 27, 2010 5:29:10 AM |
66 |
>>>Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: State of Radeon drivers |
67 |
>>> |
68 |
>>> |
69 |
>>>If you are going to use any *nix, nvidia is the best option for years now. The |
70 |
>>>nvidia closed source drivers are of professional quality and have great |
71 |
>>>performance. Actually they are the *standard* for graphics in *nix, and many |
72 |
>>>(professional or not) applications actually support only nvidia. |
73 |
>>> |
74 |
>>> |
75 |
>>>The ati oss driver is still under development, sometimes it works ok, sometimes |
76 |
>>>not, and it is mostly for basic desktop usage and in my opinion it is |
77 |
>>>progressing too slow. Anyway, I don't like having a driver that uses 10% of my |
78 |
>>>hardware's capabilties. So until it actually reaches 100% (like the rest of the |
79 |
>>>linux drivers) I can't recommend ATI on linux and nvidia is the way to go. |
80 |
>>> |
81 |
>>> |
82 |
>>>On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Florian Philipp <lists@f_philipp.fastmail.net> |
83 |
>>>wrote: |
84 |
>>> |
85 |
>>>Am 26.07.2010 01:01, schrieb James: |
86 |
>>>> |
87 |
>>>>> Florian Philipp <lists <at> f_philipp.fastmail.net> writes: |
88 |
>>>>> |
89 |
>>>>> |
90 |
>>>>>> I have a quick question: I plan to buy a notebook with an ATI Mobility |
91 |
>>>>>> Radeon HD 4250. How well would that one work? Can I reasonably expect |
92 |
>>>>>> Suspend2Ram, 3d acceleration etc to work stable? |
93 |
>>>>> |
94 |
>>>>> Well, lots of good information previously posted. Here's a |
95 |
>>>>> few more tidbits. When ATI video get's older, there's |
96 |
>>>>> always good opensource solutions to keep using it. Nvidia, |
97 |
>>>>> sometimes you toss in garbage can, or use vesa or |
98 |
>>>>> get lucky? Dunno, as I personally avoid Nvidia; other |
99 |
>>>>> insist on Nvidia..... kinda a religious thing with some..... |
100 |
>>>>> |
101 |
>>>> |
102 |
>>>>Hehe, religious is the right word. I remember a situation at my |
103 |
>>>>workplace: The admin of our departement IT ordered a Linux workstation |
104 |
>>>>with (fully supported) ATI graphics. At the last second he was overruled |
105 |
>>>>by the head of our institute's IT in favor of a completely unsupported |
106 |
>>>>and more expensive NVidia card. Not only did the poor guy have to wait |
107 |
>>>>two more weeks for the shipment to arrive, he was also stuck with the |
108 |
>>>>VESA driver for half a year and unstable NVidia drivers ever since. |
109 |
>>>> |
110 |
>>>>Well, thanks everyone who answered! Problem solved. |
111 |
>>>> |
112 |
>>>>Florian Philipp |
113 |
>>>> |
114 |
>>>> |
115 |
>>> |
116 |
> |