| 1 |
On 28/07/2013 20:23, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 18:35:07 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>> I could'nt find an emake executable. Which package contains such a |
| 5 |
>>> beast ? |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> No package explicity claims it: |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> $ ls -al /usr/lib64/portage/bin/ebuild-helpers/emake |
| 11 |
>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 922 Jul 26 16:16 |
| 12 |
>> /usr/lib64/portage/bin/ebuild-helpers/emake |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> $ equery belongs /usr/lib64/portage/bin/ebuild-helpers/emake |
| 15 |
>> * Searching for /usr/lib64/portage/bin/ebuild-helpers/emake ... |
| 16 |
>> alanm@khamul ~ |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> genlop -l shows the package emerged at that time is portage. I don't |
| 20 |
>> quite figure yet how the file got created and not recorded as belonging |
| 21 |
>> to portage. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> That's the old lib vs lib64 thing |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> ]% qfile /usr/lib64/portage/bin/ebuild-helpers/emake |
| 26 |
> returns nothing except an RC of 1 |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> % qfile /usr/lib/portage/bin/ebuild-helpers/emake |
| 29 |
> sys-apps/portage (/usr/lib/portage/bin/ebuild-helpers/emake) |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Good catch, I missed that |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
$ ls -ald /usr/lib* |
| 37 |
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 5 Jan 5 2012 /usr/lib -> lib64 |
| 38 |
drwxr-xr-x 50 root root 53248 Jul 23 10:00 /usr/lib32 |
| 39 |
drwxr-xr-x 163 root root 163840 Jul 27 01:50 /usr/lib64 |
| 40 |
drwxr-xr-x 13 root root 4096 Jul 27 01:50 /usr/libexec |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 45 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives