| 1 |
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 18:35:07 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > I could'nt find an emake executable. Which package contains such a |
| 4 |
> > beast ? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> No package explicity claims it: |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> $ ls -al /usr/lib64/portage/bin/ebuild-helpers/emake |
| 10 |
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 922 Jul 26 16:16 |
| 11 |
> /usr/lib64/portage/bin/ebuild-helpers/emake |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> $ equery belongs /usr/lib64/portage/bin/ebuild-helpers/emake |
| 14 |
> * Searching for /usr/lib64/portage/bin/ebuild-helpers/emake ... |
| 15 |
> alanm@khamul ~ |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> genlop -l shows the package emerged at that time is portage. I don't |
| 19 |
> quite figure yet how the file got created and not recorded as belonging |
| 20 |
> to portage. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
That's the old lib vs lib64 thing |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
]% qfile /usr/lib64/portage/bin/ebuild-helpers/emake |
| 25 |
returns nothing except an RC of 1 |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
% qfile /usr/lib/portage/bin/ebuild-helpers/emake |
| 28 |
sys-apps/portage (/usr/lib/portage/bin/ebuild-helpers/emake) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Top Oxymorons Number 18: Taped live |
Archives