| 1 |
On Monday 10 August 2015 13:03:14 Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 11:32:01 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Has anyone any advice on whether it's a good idea to add a keyword to |
| 4 |
> > gcc-4.9.2 so that I can make progress here? This is a stable box and |
| 5 |
> > I'd like to know whether this one, rather central ~amd64 package would |
| 6 |
> > cause trouble. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I've been using ~amd64 GCC on my MythTV boxes, which run mainly stable, |
| 9 |
> for a long time. I would keep 4.8 installed too, just in case the odd |
| 10 |
> package still doesn't like 4.9. Ironically, on my MythTV boxes, the only |
| 11 |
> package that fails with 4.9 is MythTV :-O |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
That's reassuring - thanks Neil. Will I also have to upgrade bin-utils and |
| 14 |
libtool to ~ versions? I think those two need recompiling with a new gcc |
| 15 |
version, before any of the rest of the system. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Rgds |
| 19 |
Peter |
Archives