| 1 |
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:17:18 +0200 |
| 2 |
Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Wednesday 17 December 2008 22:42:34 Robert Bridge wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > Or use a wildcard based match. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > name????stat.text works, as would name*stat.text |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> <pedantic> |
| 11 |
> name0[01][0-9]{2}stat.text |
| 12 |
> </pedantic> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> would be better still |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
<nitpick> |
| 18 |
more typing... |
| 19 |
</nitpick> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Depends on the measure, most times I have seen this kind of thing, the |
| 22 |
shorter pattern I had would have been "good enough". YMMV though, and I |
| 23 |
won't try to argue that yours is more precise. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
RobbieAB |
Archives