1 |
Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:24:52 +0100, Michael Schmarck wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> > Because a first-time installer benefits from the confidence given by |
6 |
>> > using an official install disc. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> I don't understand that. What confidence? To install Gentoo, |
9 |
>> you need a way to partition your storage, create filesystems |
10 |
>> and chroot. That can easily be done by any live CD. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Assuming you know what you are doing. |
13 |
|
14 |
Of course. And if you don't, then you should get some clue (maybe |
15 |
by reading the wonderful documentation). |
16 |
|
17 |
But if you still don't know what you're doing, then the Install |
18 |
CD would also be of no help at all for you. |
19 |
|
20 |
> If you've ever tried to help a |
21 |
> number of less confident users through it, you'd know what I mean. |
22 |
|
23 |
And why should there be a difference, if they start from a GRML |
24 |
CD compared to a Gentoo CD? |
25 |
|
26 |
> While I don't disagree that a Gentoo live CD is absolutely necessary, you |
27 |
> seem to be taking the argument further, saying that Gentoo should not |
28 |
> have its own live CD. Why? |
29 |
|
30 |
Because it's unnecessary. It adds stuff to the "Gentoo Environment" |
31 |
which needs to be supported. And it barely adds anything useful |
32 |
|
33 |
Michael |
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |