1 |
On 07/01/2014 10:58:45 AM, Dale wrote: |
2 |
> Helmut Jarausch wrote: |
3 |
> > On 07/01/2014 10:30:44 AM, Dale wrote: |
4 |
> >> |
5 |
> >> I been wanting to get me something external but hadn't got around |
6 |
> to |
7 |
> >> looking yet. I didn't know they have a SATA version. I plan to |
8 |
> avoid |
9 |
> >> USB if I can. From my understanding, eSATA can be hotplugged and |
10 |
> I have |
11 |
> >> a couple of those connections. |
12 |
> >> |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > I 'believe' that eSATA is dead - just look how few products are |
15 |
> > available. |
16 |
> > I have 3 USB-3 drives which are very fast (more than 100 MB/sec) and |
17 |
> > if your motherboard doesn't have an USB-3 adapter, yet, it's very |
18 |
> cheap. |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > Helmut |
21 |
> |
22 |
> I do have a few USB3 connectors. I just figured USB would be a good |
23 |
> bit |
24 |
> slower. Plus, can USB power a 3.5" hard drive nowadays? |
25 |
|
26 |
Probably not. All of my external USB3 disks have a separate power |
27 |
supply. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> root@fireball / # hdparm -tT /dev/sdb |
30 |
> |
31 |
> /dev/sdb: |
32 |
> Timing cached reads: 6604 MB in 2.00 seconds = 3303.39 MB/sec |
33 |
> Timing buffered disk reads: 542 MB in 3.01 seconds = 180.33 MB/sec |
34 |
> root@fireball / # |
35 |
|
36 |
Try a real life example like dd. I have seen the above mentioned speed |
37 |
on disks with a file system on it which does limit the speed anyway. |
38 |
|
39 |
> |
40 |
> I did find a eSATA enclosure on Newegg and the price wasn't bad. It's |
41 |
> one option I guess. |
42 |
> |
43 |
> Dale |
44 |
> |
45 |
> :-) :-) |
46 |
> |
47 |
> |
48 |
> |