1 |
On Tuesday, July 01, 2014 11:06:59 AM Helmut Jarausch wrote: |
2 |
> On 07/01/2014 10:58:45 AM, Dale wrote: |
3 |
> > Helmut Jarausch wrote: |
4 |
> > > On 07/01/2014 10:30:44 AM, Dale wrote: |
5 |
> > >> I been wanting to get me something external but hadn't got around |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > to |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > >> looking yet. I didn't know they have a SATA version. I plan to |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > avoid |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > >> USB if I can. From my understanding, eSATA can be hotplugged and |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > I have |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > >> a couple of those connections. |
18 |
> > > |
19 |
> > > I 'believe' that eSATA is dead - just look how few products are |
20 |
> > > available. |
21 |
> > > I have 3 USB-3 drives which are very fast (more than 100 MB/sec) and |
22 |
> > > if your motherboard doesn't have an USB-3 adapter, yet, it's very |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > cheap. |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> > > Helmut |
27 |
> > |
28 |
> > I do have a few USB3 connectors. I just figured USB would be a good |
29 |
> > bit |
30 |
> > slower. Plus, can USB power a 3.5" hard drive nowadays? |
31 |
> |
32 |
> Probably not. All of my external USB3 disks have a separate power |
33 |
> supply. |
34 |
|
35 |
I only know of 2.5" USB-drivers that are powered via the same USB-cable. |
36 |
Never seen 3.5" ones that are USB-powered. |
37 |
|
38 |
I use 2.5" drives for my backups, as they are designed for laptop use, I have |
39 |
the feeling they are a bit more robust when it comes to accidental bumps. |
40 |
|
41 |
> > root@fireball / # hdparm -tT /dev/sdb |
42 |
> > |
43 |
> > /dev/sdb: |
44 |
> > Timing cached reads: 6604 MB in 2.00 seconds = 3303.39 MB/sec |
45 |
> > Timing buffered disk reads: 542 MB in 3.01 seconds = 180.33 MB/sec |
46 |
> > |
47 |
> > root@fireball / # |
48 |
> |
49 |
> Try a real life example like dd. I have seen the above mentioned speed |
50 |
> on disks with a file system on it which does limit the speed anyway. |
51 |
|
52 |
+1 |
53 |
|
54 |
-- |
55 |
Joost |