1 |
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 16:16 +0000, James wrote: |
2 |
[a rant] |
3 |
> I have even offered to spent my limited financial resources to get |
4 |
> talented people to develop specific software and make it open source so that |
5 |
> it can be used freely, ... |
6 |
|
7 |
Just add your offer to one of these sites. [They may all be offering |
8 |
the same bounties, I didn't look to long or hard]: |
9 |
|
10 |
http://bountycounty.org/2005/12/gnome-bounty/ |
11 |
http://www.gnome.org/bounties/ |
12 |
http://swik.net/GNOME/GNOME+Bounties/GNOME+Bounty+-+Optimization/bohh?talk |
13 |
|
14 |
> 'Savior' is something Linux needs. |
15 |
|
16 |
What does Linux need saving from? IMHO Linux is the saviour, and |
17 |
various people are doing a damn fine job of making it better. Better is |
18 |
of course different for everyone, so when I say "better", I mean Linux |
19 |
is becoming an acceptable solution for a larger number of people, |
20 |
instead of just geeks (like me...) |
21 |
|
22 |
> The simple solution is for perveyours of |
23 |
> (Gentoo) linux to stop being 'bone-heads' and start being Entrepreneurs. |
24 |
|
25 |
yeauch. No thanks, the last thing I want to do is become an |
26 |
entrepreneur. I can't even spell it! I just like doing work. I hate |
27 |
all the managerial stuff that comes along. I've been doing some of it |
28 |
for the last few months and its made me want to move to where I can just |
29 |
to some Real Work[tm] again. |
30 |
|
31 |
> You make money, become affluent, you can write all the code and give it |
32 |
> to whatever cause you want. What the youth of this list do not realize is |
33 |
> their "Free time" combined with strong "programming skills" is capital. |
34 |
> use it wisely, and more capital will flow your way. |
35 |
|
36 |
If you say they don't realise it, you're assuming they want capital. |
37 |
|
38 |
> Specifically, I work as an engineer, with machines, industrial processes, |
39 |
> communications, |
40 |
|
41 |
Me too. |
42 |
|
43 |
> Yet Linux lacks a robust open source SCADA plan. |
44 |
|
45 |
Because there isn't the money for some company to come in and push Linux |
46 |
as being the Way To Go, sell lots of licenses, and make profits. Linux |
47 |
doesn't work that way - too many distributions, too much open source - |
48 |
it scares people (people who want to invest). |
49 |
|
50 |
But, if something you want in Linux doesn't exist yet, write it! |
51 |
|
52 |
> I have offered money to any young, talented person wanting to make |
53 |
> a name for themselves by championing the cause to develop an open source |
54 |
> SCADA system for (Gentoo) linux. No takers. none. Why? This could become |
55 |
> an excellent opportunity to teach software development, and migrate |
56 |
> the industrial world to Gentoo. |
57 |
|
58 |
We got sick of the pricey commercial SCADA packages that just didn't |
59 |
work well enough, so we wrote our own. We started with the |
60 |
visualisation software, wrote our own data logging software, moved onto |
61 |
a communications library (which we have running on a number of PLC's, |
62 |
real time PC's, windows PC's, industrial controllers, etc) and we're |
63 |
improving it all the time. I'm sure many other companies have done the |
64 |
same thing, but you just don't hear about it. We've just nearly |
65 |
completed a rewrite of the visualisation software, that allows people |
66 |
(for now, just us, in the future, customers) to easily create their own |
67 |
'screens' to view and control devices. |
68 |
|
69 |
In fact, not long ago we tested our version of our visualisation and |
70 |
communication software against a commercial SCADA package using Modbus |
71 |
TCP over a satellite link. Let me just say that Modbus was atrociously |
72 |
unresponsive in comparison. We've built our software to handle bad |
73 |
connections, especially poor 9600bps modems to remote areas (but I |
74 |
digress)... |
75 |
|
76 |
We've chosen Gentoo to go on our HMI PC's, as well as our industrial |
77 |
controllers (Look back in the archives for some discussions on getting |
78 |
Gentoo to fit in under 64Mb). |
79 |
|
80 |
> My answer to Savior Linux is "put the check into the mail, and I'll be |
81 |
> right there". |
82 |
|
83 |
I think it works the other way around. You might have to do something |
84 |
first, and then see if the check turns up. |
85 |
|
86 |
> video controls and display of video needs to be added to the SCADA software. |
87 |
|
88 |
Not there yet. Don't know that we're heading in that direction |
89 |
either... |
90 |
|
91 |
So, do I want your check? Probably not. Will we ever release our |
92 |
software to the public domain? Maybe. Will people use it? Maybe not. |
93 |
The fact is, we started as a small (2 person) company, started writing |
94 |
our own software and hardware design, we were about 8 people when I |
95 |
joined, continued with bigger and better software and hardware with less |
96 |
components made by other people and more by us, and now we're over 30 |
97 |
people, and still moving. I'm sure we're not the only success story in |
98 |
the world. |
99 |
-- |
100 |
Iain Buchanan <iaindb at netspace dot net dot au> |
101 |
|
102 |
"MSDOS didn't get as bad as it is overnight -- it took over ten years |
103 |
of careful development." |
104 |
(By dmeggins@××××××××××××.ca) |
105 |
|
106 |
-- |
107 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |