| 1 |
Bill Kenworthy <billk <at> iinet.net.au> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > How is btrfs , from the "driver's seat"? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> I have had one instance of a more serious corruption caused by |
| 6 |
> some bug in btrfs that needed the latest btrfsck from git to fix |
| 7 |
> offline - later kernels do not suffer from this apparently. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Interesting... |
| 10 |
BTRFS |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> Otherwise I have been hammering it as a dirvish backup server and except |
| 14 |
> for speed its fine - and I wont be able to confirm that the speed issue |
| 15 |
> is btrfs's fault until I get the partitioning correct - and dirvish is |
| 16 |
> somewhat unique in what it does so it could be a special case. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I found the 4k sectors problem. |
| 19 |
Weird. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
btrfs should be |
| 22 |
fast.... |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
thanks |
| 26 |
for all |
| 27 |
the responses, |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
james |
Archives