1 |
Grant writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Shouldn't top have provided some kind of info for why the CPU usage |
4 |
> was 100% for 5 minutes straight? If it does display trends, shouldn't |
5 |
> it have picked up on that one? |
6 |
|
7 |
I bet it was updatedb. This is what top shows me when it is running: |
8 |
|
9 |
Cpu(s): 15.6% us, 12.6% sy, 0.3% ni, 0.0% id, 70.2% wa, 1.3% hi, 0.0% si |
10 |
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND |
11 |
1563 root 18 0 1936 928 528 R 8.9 0.2 0:09.68 updatedb |
12 |
|
13 |
Whatever this "wa" entry is, probably something with I/O related waiting, |
14 |
it seems is it not being taken into account for the %CPU culumn entry of the |
15 |
process. |
16 |
|
17 |
I think whis was different with kernel 2.4, it did not show such a high |
18 |
load, while performing similar as now when updatedb was running. |
19 |
|
20 |
Alex |
21 |
-- |
22 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |