Archives
Archives
| From: | Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] 100% CPU usage with no processes to blame? | ||
| Date: | Fri, 16 Feb 2007 21:05:32 | ||
| Message-Id: | 49bf44f10702161255l34e887b3sfaeb8f8a5bd9b09f@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] 100% CPU usage with no processes to blame? by Alan McKinnon |
||
| 1 | > When we say that top lies, we really mean that it is giving you an |
| 2 | > average over a looooooong period of cpu time, and you should interpret |
| 3 | > it as such. It's a trend, not an instant value. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Shouldn't top have provided some kind of info for why the CPU usage |
| 6 | was 100% for 5 minutes straight? If it does display trends, shouldn't |
| 7 | it have picked up on that one? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | - Grant |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] 100% CPU usage with no processes to blame? | Alex Schuster <wonko@×××××××××.org> |