1 |
2007/12/14, James <wireless@×××××××××××.com>: |
2 |
> Hemmann, Volker Armin <volker.armin.hemmann <at> tu-clausthal.de> writes: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > Nowadays CFQ and deadline are the best choices. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> > Why not built all three and switch between them with the apropriate kernel |
8 |
> > command line. That way you can easily test which one is the best for you. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Hello Hemmann, |
11 |
> |
12 |
> This sounds interesting. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Are you saying build all 3 as modules? (I've never tried this.) |
15 |
> |
16 |
> And then use cli to swithch between these three for dynamic |
17 |
> testing without rebooting? (seems like a very cool idea)... |
18 |
> |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Could you share some command line syntax on exactly what you are suggesting? |
21 |
> or a simple script, if that is easier...? |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Any wikis or further reading along these lines would be of keen interest |
24 |
> to me. I'd be real interested to learn what kernel parameters for live |
25 |
> performance tuning, one can dynamically pass to a running kernel. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> |
28 |
> curiously, |
29 |
> James |
30 |
|
31 |
Take a look in the kernel docs. It is not that difficult. It should be |
32 |
under Documentation/block/switching-sched.txt |
33 |
|
34 |
You can build the schedulers as module or directly in the kernel, |
35 |
maybe you need to load the module before when using them as modules. |
36 |
-- |
37 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |