| 1 |
Hemmann, Volker Armin <volker.armin.hemmann <at> tu-clausthal.de> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Nowadays CFQ and deadline are the best choices. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> Why not built all three and switch between them with the apropriate kernel |
| 7 |
> command line. That way you can easily test which one is the best for you. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Hello Hemmann, |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
This sounds interesting. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Are you saying build all 3 as modules? (I've never tried this.) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
And then use cli to swithch between these three for dynamic |
| 16 |
testing without rebooting? (seems like a very cool idea)... |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Could you share some command line syntax on exactly what you are suggesting? |
| 20 |
or a simple script, if that is easier...? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Any wikis or further reading along these lines would be of keen interest |
| 23 |
to me. I'd be real interested to learn what kernel parameters for live |
| 24 |
performance tuning, one can dynamically pass to a running kernel. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
curiously, |
| 28 |
James |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives