| 1 |
On 12/05/2013 13:29, covici@××××××××××.com wrote: |
| 2 |
> Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> On Sun, 12 May 2013 02:50:44 -0400, covici@××××××××××.com wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>> Hi. I am using gentoo unstable and after this last update when I tried |
| 7 |
>>> to do emerge @preserved-rebuild I get the following: |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> I didn't know Gentoo specifically made an unstable version, it's |
| 10 |
>> generally rock solid for me. |
| 11 |
> Buy unstable I meant ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86 ~amd64" |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>>> These are the packages that would be merged, in order: |
| 16 |
>>> |
| 17 |
>>> Calculating dependencies .... done! |
| 18 |
>>> |
| 19 |
>>> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "net-libs/xulrunner:1.9". |
| 20 |
>>> (dependency required by "@preserved-rebuild" [argument]) |
| 21 |
>>> |
| 22 |
>>> I have xulrunner 2.0 installed, although it looks like nothing depends |
| 23 |
>>> on that package, so I am not sure what is going on. I looked at |
| 24 |
>>> /var/lib/portage/preserved-rebuild-registrybut can't find xulrunner |
| 25 |
>>> anywhere in that file. How can I proceed? |
| 26 |
>> |
| 27 |
>> emerge -cav xulrunner |
| 28 |
> I have no ebuilds for xulrunner at all in the tree. But I will try as |
| 29 |
> you suggest because there seems to be nothing dependent on it. |
| 30 |
> Well, that did something good, now its going right along. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> Thanks so much -- this is a great mailing list. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
xulrunner is no longer in the tree. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
What I would do is run ldd on everything in lib dirs and grep for |
| 37 |
xulrunner to find which ancient package wants it. Then rebuild that package. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 43 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives