1 |
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 00:22:57 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
2 |
> On Montag 16 November 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
3 |
> > On Monday 16 November 2009 21:26:02 Doug Hunley wrote: |
4 |
> > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 03:24, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > wrote: |
7 |
> > > > Does anyone here successfully use amarok-2.2.0 with mysql-5.0.84-r1? |
8 |
> > > |
9 |
> > > I haven't had any issues w/ amarok 2.2.0 and mysql 5.0.84-r1 (once I |
10 |
> > > figured out how to get amarok to _not_ use the embedded mysql) |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > That's a common complaint about amarok lately. The devs reckon they must |
13 |
> > use multi-user mysql because it's almost impossible to get sqlite to do |
14 |
> > it properly and totally impossible to get it to do it remotely. |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > This puzzles me. How many users out their use their music player in |
17 |
> > multi-user mode with a collection db on a remote machine? Apart from |
18 |
> > LTSP installs, I'll bet it's none. And LTSP is better off using mpd, so |
19 |
> > why didn't the amarok devs simply include mpd support? |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> > To answer your question, does Settings -> Collection -> enable check box |
22 |
> > & fill in bottom half of dialog do what you want? |
23 |
> |
24 |
> there had been other reasons. Many people have huge collections - and |
25 |
> sqlite sucks with huge collections. |
26 |
|
27 |
I misread his post - I though he wanted to know how to disable mysqle (he'd |
28 |
figured that out already), then my train of though went off into other (even |
29 |
wronger) directions with embedded vs non-embedded mysql for amarok. |
30 |
|
31 |
Meanwhile I compared by flags to yours and tried rebuilding mysql with |
32 |
-community -berkdb then rebuilding Amarok. This didn't change anything. |
33 |
|
34 |
Busy downgrading binutils (#290662) now and trying again |
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |