| 1 |
On Montag 16 November 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 16 November 2009 21:26:02 Doug Hunley wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 03:24, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > Does anyone here successfully use amarok-2.2.0 with mysql-5.0.84-r1? |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > I haven't had any issues w/ amarok 2.2.0 and mysql 5.0.84-r1 (once I |
| 9 |
> > figured out how to get amarok to _not_ use the embedded mysql) |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> That's a common complaint about amarok lately. The devs reckon they must |
| 12 |
> use multi-user mysql because it's almost impossible to get sqlite to do it |
| 13 |
> properly and totally impossible to get it to do it remotely. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> This puzzles me. How many users out their use their music player in |
| 16 |
> multi-user mode with a collection db on a remote machine? Apart from LTSP |
| 17 |
> installs, I'll bet it's none. And LTSP is better off using mpd, so why |
| 18 |
> didn't the amarok devs simply include mpd support? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> To answer your question, does Settings -> Collection -> enable check box & |
| 21 |
> fill in bottom half of dialog do what you want? |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
there had been other reasons. Many people have huge collections - and sqlite |
| 25 |
sucks with huge collections. |
Archives