1 |
On 2020.02.06 17:36, Laurence Perkins wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 2020-02-01 at 17:08 -0500, Jack wrote: |
3 |
>> CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Do not click links or open |
4 |
>> attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is |
5 |
>> safe. |
6 |
I didn't write that. :-) |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > Relying on the collective experience and advice of the group here. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
>> As may be obvious to many of you, the address this message is sent |
11 |
>> from "...@×××××××××××××××××.net" isn't really a fully functional |
12 |
>> address. Email sent to that address will be forwarded by the |
13 |
>> sourceforge system to a personal address I specify. When I send a |
14 |
>> message "From: " that address, however, I cannot send it through the |
15 |
>> sourceforge system, as I don't actually have an email account with |
16 |
>> them. Currently, I send it through my gmail account. That works |
17 |
>> because I added that address in my gmail Settings under "Accounts |
18 |
>> and Import" / "Send mail as:". To set it up, gmail sends a message |
19 |
>> to that address, and I click on a link in the message to prove it |
20 |
>> does come to me. That's been working find for a long time, but, ... |
21 |
> > |
22 |
>> I'm trying to move away from gmail. Especially for mailing lists |
23 |
>> like this one, if I send a message to the list, I never see that I |
24 |
>> get the message from the list, because gmail refuses to show it in |
25 |
>> my inbox because it's a duplicate of a message already in my sentbox. |
26 |
> > |
27 |
>> I do have an email account with privateemail.com (thorough |
28 |
>> namecheap.com) but they are unable or unwilling to have a similar |
29 |
>> setup. I'm not even sure they actually understand what I'm asking |
30 |
>> of them, but I've wasted more than enough time trying. |
31 |
> > |
32 |
>> So - I'm asking if anyone can recommend an email service provider |
33 |
>> that understands this and will let me set it up. I have my own |
34 |
>> domain, but namecheap.com does seem willing to have the appropriate |
35 |
>> DNS record point to a different email provider. At this point, I'm |
36 |
>> not interested in running my own email server. I currently only |
37 |
>> need two mailboxes, maybe a small number more in the future, but |
38 |
>> this is personal, not commercial. I don't need to do bulk emails, |
39 |
>> maybe up to a dozen or so recipients. I do NOT expect it to be |
40 |
>> free, but cost is at least some consideration. I don't need huge |
41 |
>> storage limits, as although I use IMAP access when on the road, when |
42 |
>> I'm home, I use POP3 to download everything. I'd also like at least |
43 |
>> minimal control over spam filtering, mainly to let almost anything |
44 |
>> through for me to filter locally. If privateemail.com has false |
45 |
>> positives for everything from some sender (such as ups.com, for |
46 |
>> example) I need to open a ticket with them to add a whitelist. No |
47 |
>> such thing as clicking on "Not spam" and apparently no intent to |
48 |
>> ever do so. |
49 |
> > |
50 |
> > Thanks for any suggestions. |
51 |
> > |
52 |
> > Jack |
53 |
Laurence, |
54 |
|
55 |
Thanks for the feedback. |
56 |
|
57 |
> You might talk to your ISP. A number of them offer custom email |
58 |
> hosting to businesses and will maintain the server for you, but allow |
59 |
> you a rather customized configuration. So kind of like having your |
60 |
> own server along with someone to manage it for you. |
61 |
Well, I'm in Connecticut, and my current ISP is Comcast, previous ISP |
62 |
Frontier, and I wish to have as little as possible to do with either of |
63 |
them. A major part of the whole reason I'm doing this is to be able to |
64 |
switch ISPs without having to do anything at all and still have my |
65 |
email flow. |
66 |
> |
67 |
> If you do end up running your own system, look through your options |
68 |
> thoroughly. Sure you can set up just a simple email server, but |
69 |
> there are also projects like http://citadel.org/doku.php that offer |
70 |
> more, integrated features for an experience similar to gmail, but |
71 |
> without the spying. |
72 |
That certainly looks interesting, but claiming it's at all like gmail |
73 |
is not a selling point for me. |
74 |
|
75 |
Jack |