1 |
120520 Michael Mol wrote: |
2 |
> as Philip later remarked, it turns out the lens was likely a 75mm prime |
3 |
|
4 |
The picture of the camera looks exactly what I remember, |
5 |
tho' there might have been different models with different lenses. |
6 |
It was a very good camera for its time. |
7 |
|
8 |
> The leftmost portion will never look all that great, |
9 |
> as he captured the Sun setting behind a building |
10 |
> or maybe that's a water spot |
11 |
|
12 |
The Sun was indeed setting to the left at that time + date, |
13 |
but the bluish blemish is some sort of physical decay in the negative, |
14 |
which was stored in a cardboard box for c 55 yr without being touched. |
15 |
|
16 |
> If these source JPG files are scans of paper photos |
17 |
|
18 |
No, they're 2 overlapping scans of the same negative, |
19 |
whose size is 58 x 43 mm = 2,3 x 1,7 inch . |
20 |
|
21 |
> Anyway, the final Hugin pto file is here: http://pastebin.com/gudxvAEa |
22 |
|
23 |
What is a 'pto' file ? -- I downloaded it & it's text. |
24 |
|
25 |
> And the final stitch is here: |
26 |
> http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/2030/brum3068brum30702.jpg |
27 |
|
28 |
All Firefox gives me is a black window : can you check ? |
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
========================,,============================================ |
32 |
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb |
33 |
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto |
34 |
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca |