| 1 |
On 2017-08-01, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tuesday 01 Aug 2017 16:00:07 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 01/08/2017 15:55, Grant Edwards wrote: |
| 4 |
>> > On 2017-08-01, Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> >> Everyone is expected to be on at least GCC 5 now. |
| 6 |
>> > |
| 7 |
>> > OK, next dumb question: |
| 8 |
>> > |
| 9 |
>> > There are 11 versions marked as stable for amd64. How does one find |
| 10 |
>> > out which version of GCC one is "expected to be on"? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I can only see three versions marked as stable on the main portage tree, two |
| 13 |
> of them being GCC 4 leaving one 5.4.0-r3 as the obvious candidate. The |
| 14 |
> remaining are Masked, or testing: |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
If you look at |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-devel/gcc |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
It showls eleven versions for amd64 in green with a '+' symbol. I |
| 21 |
thought that meant they were stable. But, as there's no key on that |
| 22 |
page explaining what the colors and symbols mean, I was evidently |
| 23 |
wrong. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! I was making donuts |
| 27 |
at and now I'm on a bus! |
| 28 |
gmail.com |
Archives