| 1 |
On Di, 01 Aug 15:33:11 +0000 |
| 2 |
Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
>On 2017-08-01, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> On Tuesday 01 Aug 2017 16:00:07 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> On 01/08/2017 15:55, Grant Edwards wrote: |
| 6 |
>>> > On 2017-08-01, Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> >> Everyone is expected to be on at least GCC 5 now. |
| 8 |
>>> > |
| 9 |
>>> > OK, next dumb question: |
| 10 |
>>> > |
| 11 |
>>> > There are 11 versions marked as stable for amd64. How does one find |
| 12 |
>>> > out which version of GCC one is "expected to be on"? |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> I can only see three versions marked as stable on the main portage tree, two |
| 15 |
>> of them being GCC 4 leaving one 5.4.0-r3 as the obvious candidate. The |
| 16 |
>> remaining are Masked, or testing: |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
>If you look at |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-devel/gcc |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
>It showls eleven versions for amd64 in green with a '+' symbol. I |
| 23 |
>thought that meant they were stable. But, as there's no key on that |
| 24 |
>page explaining what the colors and symbols mean, I was evidently |
| 25 |
>wrong. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
You are right that is a little bit odd and confusing. One have to look |
| 29 |
at the mouse tool tip while hovering those symbols. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
$ equery keywords sys-devel/gcc |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
is more clear on this. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
Regards, |
| 38 |
floyd |
Archives