1 |
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Chris Walters wrote: |
4 |
> > This is a test. Enigmail has been trying to use a revoked and expired |
5 |
> key to |
6 |
> > sign my messages, lately. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > Chris |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> I have a question now. I got a message from Paul Hartman and replied to |
11 |
> it, off list, and it was encrypted and I hope my reply was too. My |
12 |
> question is this. How do you make a email that only the sender and |
13 |
> receiver can read? As a example. I'm talking to a Doctor or a lawyer |
14 |
> and I don't want anyone but that person to see the email. How do I do |
15 |
> that? Can that be done. |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
Yes, this occurs when the messages are actually encrypted. Both the sender |
19 |
and receiver must generate a public and private key. The public key |
20 |
is...public. Anyone and everyone can use it to encipher a message. However, |
21 |
the private key should be..well, private. It is the key that |
22 |
can decipher the message. Assuming the receiver keeps this key secret, all |
23 |
messages that are encrypted with the public key will only be read by |
24 |
him/her. |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
> |
28 |
|
29 |
The message that I am repying to appears to be something, encypted |
30 |
> maybe, but I think anyone on this list that uses the tool can read it. |
31 |
> Am I correct? |
32 |
> |
33 |
|
34 |
I'm using gmail right now, so I can't verify, but the message was most |
35 |
likely signed but not encrypted. By signing the message, Chris verified |
36 |
that he actually sent it and it wasn't someone impersonating. (This all |
37 |
hinges on the fact that you previously received his signature and trust |
38 |
that it was authentic then) |
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
|
42 |
> I'm trying to get a full understanding of this thing. Ya'll know how I |
43 |
> am. lol |
44 |
> |
45 |
> Dale |
46 |
> |
47 |
> :-) :-) |
48 |
> |
49 |
> |
50 |
Matt |
51 |
-- |
52 |
Matthew Finkel |