| 1 |
On Wednesday 23 July 2014 14:48:08 James wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I also run "noscript" on my browsers now (very cool!). I do not consider it |
| 4 |
> a problem, when I have to click a button or 2 to allow something |
| 5 |
> that noscript has identified and filtered as a possilbe point |
| 6 |
> of caution. I like noscript and have little desire to permanently |
| 7 |
> disable it, so suggestions must work reasonable well with noscript too. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I used to run noscript, and was often annoyed and frustrated on e-commerce |
| 10 |
sites when a page refused to load. I'd have to tell the script (!) to allow |
| 11 |
this new site, then go back and try again, which often required more data |
| 12 |
input - or even starting again from scratch. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Nowadays I have "yesscript", which claims to be more intelligent about |
| 15 |
blocking scripts. You might like to give it a whirl. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Regards |
| 19 |
Peter |
Archives