Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: reiser4 status
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 05:30:01
Message-Id: 200802170629.55645.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: reiser4 status by felix@crowfix.com
1 On Sonntag, 17. Februar 2008, felix@×××××××.com wrote:
2 > On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 03:41:36AM +0000, James wrote:
3 > > That's the whole rub (in essence) as to why reiser4fs will never make it
4 > > into the kernel. Lots of kernel folks *do not trust Hans Reiser*.......
5 > >
6 > > His abusive shenanigans are an issue, but, not really why reiser4fs is
7 > > doomed.
8 >
9 > As I understand it, the main arguments against reiser4 are that it
10 > duplicates a ton of code in the VFS (Virtual File System)
11
12 it did not duplicate code, but contained code some devs believed to belong
13 into the vfs layer.
14
15 Funnily some month ago ext4 devs tried the same - and had to be stopped by
16 Andrew Morton.
17 --
18 gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: reiser4 status Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>