Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: felix@×××××××.com
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: reiser4 status
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 04:57:28
Message-Id: 20080217045718.GA18085@crowfix.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: reiser4 status by James
1 On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 03:41:36AM +0000, James wrote:
2
3 > That's the whole rub (in essence) as to why reiser4fs will never make it into
4 > the kernel. Lots of kernel folks *do not trust Hans Reiser*.......
5 >
6 > His abusive shenanigans are an issue, but, not really why reiser4fs is doomed.
7
8 As I understand it, the main arguments against reiser4 are that it
9 duplicates a ton of code in the VFS (Virtual File System) which
10 underpins all other file systems (ext2/3/4, xfs, jfs, etc) and most
11 developers think the reiser4 parts ought to be in the VFS, or at least
12 not fighting it. Hans doesn't believe that, or professes to believe
13 that is merely stalling tactics, and would rather throw hissy fits
14 than actually discuss it reasonably. But I don't write kernel code,
15 so this is only what I recall from lwn.net reports.
16
17 --
18 ... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
19 Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / felix@×××××××.com
20 GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E 6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933
21 I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o
22 --
23 gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: reiser4 status Volker Armin Hemmann <volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de>