1 |
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 03:41:36AM +0000, James wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> That's the whole rub (in essence) as to why reiser4fs will never make it into |
4 |
> the kernel. Lots of kernel folks *do not trust Hans Reiser*....... |
5 |
> |
6 |
> His abusive shenanigans are an issue, but, not really why reiser4fs is doomed. |
7 |
|
8 |
As I understand it, the main arguments against reiser4 are that it |
9 |
duplicates a ton of code in the VFS (Virtual File System) which |
10 |
underpins all other file systems (ext2/3/4, xfs, jfs, etc) and most |
11 |
developers think the reiser4 parts ought to be in the VFS, or at least |
12 |
not fighting it. Hans doesn't believe that, or professes to believe |
13 |
that is merely stalling tactics, and would rather throw hissy fits |
14 |
than actually discuss it reasonably. But I don't write kernel code, |
15 |
so this is only what I recall from lwn.net reports. |
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._. |
19 |
Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / felix@×××××××.com |
20 |
GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E 6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933 |
21 |
I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o |
22 |
-- |
23 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |