1 |
You probably were not asking _too_ much. If you are dependent upon |
2 |
the system for your livelihood, I'd find somewhere else to host, |
3 |
since these folks sound like bozos. |
4 |
|
5 |
IANAL, but if you have a contract with them there may be service |
6 |
level agreements that they're obligated to uphold, and they might not |
7 |
be upholding them. |
8 |
--- |
9 |
dcw |
10 |
|
11 |
|
12 |
On Sep 22, 2007, at 9:54 AM, Dan Farrell wrote: |
13 |
|
14 |
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:37:23 -0700 |
15 |
> Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com> wrote: |
16 |
> |
17 |
>> Hello, |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>> As I have previously posted about, my host sent me an email a few |
20 |
>> days |
21 |
>> ago stating that support tickets for 5,000-6,000 of their clients had |
22 |
>> been broken into. I checked my records and found that my root |
23 |
>> password had previously been submitted in a support ticket. I then |
24 |
>> decided I needed to reinstall my system. |
25 |
>> |
26 |
>> I requested that my host allow me access to a second machine for 2-5 |
27 |
>> days while I switch over to a clean system, after that I would turn |
28 |
>> the old system over to them and continue with the new system. |
29 |
>> |
30 |
>> My request was denied! I'm blown away by this. Was I asking too |
31 |
>> much? |
32 |
>> |
33 |
>> - Grant |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Would it be unreasonable to tell us who this host is? I want to make |
36 |
> sure I don't host any sites on their system; if they can't secure |
37 |
> their |
38 |
> work tickets, what makes anybody think they can secure anything else? |
39 |
> -- |
40 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
41 |
> |
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |