| 1 |
Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 05 July 2010 08:08:05 Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Mick wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>> PS. Google is only as good as your ability to find the terms by which you |
| 7 |
>>> should be searching. I understand they are working hard on reading our |
| 8 |
>>> thoughts. |
| 9 |
>>> |
| 10 |
>> +1 |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> I like how folks that have the answer say to Google for it. If you |
| 13 |
>> don't know what to tell Google to find, Google isn't worth $0.01 on the |
| 14 |
>> subject. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> Now after you get the answer, Google is great. :-) |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
> Noooooooooooooooo, you don't get it. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> You must google the question to get the search terms |
| 21 |
> Then you must google the search terms to get the answer |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Two-step process! |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
That doesn't usually work for me in even a three or four step process. lol |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Dale |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
:-) :-) |
Archives