1 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 18:49:50 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>>> And now finally we have Zac, a brave man who has taken on the |
5 |
>>> thankless task of sorting the mess out. Most of his deep changes over |
6 |
>>> the past two years or so are to make things consistent within the |
7 |
>>> overall grand plan. |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>> Stuff breaks badly when you do that. But it has to be done. Today it's |
10 |
>>> your turn to be on the sharp end. |
11 |
>> I'm fine with suffering a little for the greater good, but is the new |
12 |
>> behavior better in any tangible way? |
13 |
> It is reasonable to assume that the answer to that question is "yes". Any |
14 |
> other answer raises the question "why did Zac spend so much effort |
15 |
> recoding portage just to piss off the odd user?". |
16 |
> |
17 |
> |
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
I always knew I was "odd". Looks like I have some company tho. Welcome |
21 |
to the "odd user" group Michael. |
22 |
|
23 |
Dale |
24 |
|
25 |
:-) :-) |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |
29 |
|
30 |
Miss the compile output? Hint: |
31 |
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n" |