| 1 |
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 18:49:50 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > And now finally we have Zac, a brave man who has taken on the |
| 4 |
> > thankless task of sorting the mess out. Most of his deep changes over |
| 5 |
> > the past two years or so are to make things consistent within the |
| 6 |
> > overall grand plan. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > Stuff breaks badly when you do that. But it has to be done. Today it's |
| 9 |
> > your turn to be on the sharp end. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I'm fine with suffering a little for the greater good, but is the new |
| 12 |
> behavior better in any tangible way? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
It is reasonable to assume that the answer to that question is "yes". Any |
| 15 |
other answer raises the question "why did Zac spend so much effort |
| 16 |
recoding portage just to piss off the odd user?". |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Linux users do it without paying a Bill |
Archives