| 1 |
On 01/02/2012 06:25 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:08:44 -0500 |
| 3 |
> Michael Orlitzky<michael@××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>> Making your software punish its users isn't going to make them more |
| 7 |
>> careful, it's going to make them stop using your software. If bash |
| 8 |
>> did an 'rm -rf /' when you mistyped a command[1], would you think, |
| 9 |
>> gee, I need to be more careful? Or would you think the guy who made |
| 10 |
>> it do that was an asshole? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> That's an interesting question. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Moving slightly OT, I think most of the devs who worked on portage in |
| 16 |
> the past (starting with Daniel) have little clue about proper design |
| 17 |
> and just slapped stuff/features on with little thought. It might not |
| 18 |
> actually BE that way, but it sure LOOKS like it. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> And now finally we have Zac, a brave man who has taken on the thankless |
| 21 |
> task of sorting the mess out. Most of his deep changes over the past |
| 22 |
> two years or so are to make things consistent within the overall grand |
| 23 |
> plan. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Stuff breaks badly when you do that. But it has to be done. Today it's |
| 26 |
> your turn to be on the sharp end. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
I'm fine with suffering a little for the greater good, but is the new |
| 29 |
behavior better in any tangible way? |
Archives