| 1 |
on 2013-07-21 at 15:42 Peter Wilmott wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> TBH, unless you are really stressing your RAM usage (Lots of VMs or Java |
| 4 |
> applications, stuff like that) I'd go without swap. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
it's true that most of the time 12BG is more than enough for me and i |
| 7 |
don't use swap space on disk. i wouldn't go for a swapless system, though, |
| 8 |
specially since i'm going to put things on tmpfs. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
a few GB (i'm thinking about 8) of swap space on disk won't hurt, and i'd |
| 11 |
feel safer. that's the idea of reducing swappiness to 1 or 0, anyway. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
best, |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
lj |
Archives