| 1 |
* Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> [110726 09:46]: |
| 2 |
> Todd Goodman wrote: |
| 3 |
> > |
| 4 |
> > I'll let you know if I see anything that looks related. It would be |
| 5 |
> > interesting if going back to 2.6.38 is a temp fix for you. I know you'd |
| 6 |
> > tried older kernels before but... |
| 7 |
> > Todd |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> This makes me wonder. I have went all the way back to 2.6.35-r15 and it |
| 12 |
> does the same thing. Could it be that my problem is unrelated? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
It's certainly possible it's unrelated. Or it could be something |
| 15 |
similar and the other bug reporter made a mistake bisecting or didn't run |
| 16 |
long enough to fail with that bisection. It's possibly a lot of things |
| 17 |
since we don't have enough information. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Also, I copied my current config over and ran make oldconfig. Since I |
| 21 |
> am actually downgrading, would that work the same way or would it have |
| 22 |
> settings that no longer apply and may muck things up? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I don't think that would work OK (but don't know for sure.) In most |
| 25 |
cases it would probably work OK as I believe unused parameters will |
| 26 |
be ignored. But if a parameter was removed or the meaning changed then |
| 27 |
you might have a problem (unlikely I'd guess, but I don't know.) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Todd |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> Dale |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> :-) :-) |
Archives