| 1 |
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 23:30:38 +0100 |
| 2 |
Sebastian Beßler <webmaster@××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Am 13.12.2009 23:19, schrieb »Q«: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > That looks like a bug. Heh, it would be nice if the initscripts |
| 7 |
> > worked with the current stable version of baselayout. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> This is no bug, it is just how baselayout 1 and 2 are created. You |
| 11 |
> don't need a initscript to start udev with baselayout 1 as it is |
| 12 |
> started automaticaly. This changed with baselayout 2 and thats why it |
| 13 |
> is there. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
That makes perfect sense. Thanks for the explanation. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
»Q« |
| 19 |
Kleeneness is next to Gödelness. |
Archives