Archives
Archives
| From: | "Sebastian Beßler" <webmaster@××××××××××××.de> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What magic does portage use? | ||
| Date: | Sun, 13 Dec 2009 22:31:04 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4B256B0E.6010308@darkmetatron.de | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Re: What magic does portage use? by "»Q«" |
||
| 1 | Am 13.12.2009 23:19, schrieb »Q«: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > That looks like a bug. Heh, it would be nice if the initscripts worked |
| 4 | > with the current stable version of baselayout. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | This is no bug, it is just how baselayout 1 and 2 are created. You don't |
| 8 | need a initscript to start udev with baselayout 1 as it is started |
| 9 | automaticaly. This changed with baselayout 2 and thats why it is there. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Greetings |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Sebastian |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-user] Re: What magic does portage use? | "»Q«" <boxcars@×××.net> |