| 1 |
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Timur Aydin <ta@××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 10/13/12 04:11, Mark Knecht wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Take look here. The answer is, I think, not necessarily. |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> http://www.makelinux.net/alp/032 |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Hello Mark, |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Thank you for the link to an excellent book. However, it seems the book |
| 11 |
> is talking about linuxthreads by Xavier Leroy, not nptl. I am well aware |
| 12 |
> that linuxthreads uses LWP's to implement threads and as a result, each |
| 13 |
> thread has a separate, unique pid. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I did a few more tests using gdb and my simple app. I am seeing the |
| 16 |
> SIG32 signal and the lack of the manager threads. So everything hints |
| 17 |
> that I am indeed using nptl, but the separate process id's still doesn't |
| 18 |
> make sense... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I'm a little late to the conversation...but is there an NPTL-directed |
| 21 |
sample program somewhere you can use as a baseline? i.e., to be able |
| 22 |
to say, "if this works, I know NPTL does, and I know what an NPTL |
| 23 |
program looks like at the system level." |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
:wq |
Archives