Archives
Archives
| From: | "Anno v. Heimburg" <anno@×××××××××××.de> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: Is the best solution still NIS+NFS? | ||
| Date: | Fri, 11 Aug 2006 20:54:06 | ||
| Message-Id: | ebiqep$3kf$2@sea.gmane.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Re: Is the best solution still NIS+NFS? by reader@newsguy.com | ||
| 1 | reader@×××××××.com wrote: |
| 2 | > But when the direction is windows => linux. How does cifs come into play? |
| 3 | |
| 4 | I don't quite get your question. CIFS/SMB is what Windows uses for its |
| 5 | network shares. Using samba, Linux can both share and mount* CIFS volumes. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Anno |
| 8 | |
| 9 | *) For mounting, you have to also compile SMB support into the kernel. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-user] Re: Is the best solution still NIS+NFS? | reader@×××××××.com |