From: | reader@×××××××.com | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: Is the best solution still NIS+NFS? | ||
Date: | Fri, 11 Aug 2006 21:16:16 | ||
Message-Id: | 87irkz9dvy.fsf@newsguy.com | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Re: Is the best solution still NIS+NFS? by "Anno v. Heimburg" |
1 | "Anno v. Heimburg" <anno@×××××××××××.de> writes: |
2 | |
3 | > reader@×××××××.com wrote: |
4 | >> But when the direction is windows => linux. How does cifs come into play? |
5 | > |
6 | > I don't quite get your question. CIFS/SMB is what Windows uses for its |
7 | > network shares. Using samba, Linux can both share and mount* CIFS volumes. |
8 | |
9 | Oh sorry I was laboring under the notion smb disn not include cifs. |
10 | My mistake. |
11 | |
12 | |
13 | -- |
14 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |