| 1 |
On 2007-02-13, Grant Edwards <grante@××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2007-02-13, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> --Sig_lS1=cG+70d+87khmlF48UgContent-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
| 4 |
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:35:27 +0000 (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote: |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>>> What am I doing wrong? |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> Not searching bugs.gentoo.org before posting here |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I did, smartass. Unfortantely, the gentoo bug database search |
| 13 |
> facility completely sucks: |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=thunar |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166573 |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> How in hell are you supposed to find bugs for thunar when the |
| 20 |
> don't show up when you search on "thunar"? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I'd like to apologize for the attitude in this posting. I've |
| 23 |
been using Gentoo for over a year and I've always been |
| 24 |
extremely frustrated with the Gentoo bug search facility. I |
| 25 |
never realized that the search on the main bugs.gentoo.org page |
| 26 |
only searched for open bugs. I guess everybody else was just |
| 27 |
born knowing that and I missed out on the Gentoo bug search |
| 28 |
gene somehow. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
For those of us thusly disabled, I think it would be a very |
| 31 |
good idea to actually state that default search is only for |
| 32 |
open bugs on the search page at ttp://bugs.gentoo.org/ _and_ |
| 33 |
display on the results page what the search criteria were. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Grant Edwards grante Yow! The Korean War must |
| 37 |
at have been fun. |
| 38 |
visi.com |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives