1 |
· Darren Kirby <bulliver@×××××××××××.org>: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Quoth the Alexander Skwar |
4 |
>> Darren Kirby <bulliver@×××××××××××.org>: |
5 |
>> > Quoth the Alexander Skwar |
6 |
>> > |
7 |
>> >> · maxim wexler <blissfix@×××××.com>: |
8 |
>> >> >>digg2ogg |
9 |
>> >> > |
10 |
>> >> > should be dir2ogg |
11 |
>> >> |
12 |
>> >> 0.8 is the latest stable version. Why do you think, that a different |
13 |
>> >> version should be offered, when you "emerge dir2ogg"? |
14 |
>> > |
15 |
>> > Well, I'm the upstream author, and _I_ think there should be different |
16 |
>> > (ie: newer) version offered. Good enough? |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> No, not good enough, as that doesn't matter at all. All that matters is, |
19 |
>> what's in the tree. And the latest stable version is 0.8, no matter what |
20 |
>> you think. The question remains: Why should a different version be offered? |
21 |
>> |
22 |
>> Alexander Skwar |
23 |
>> -- |
24 |
>> A closed mouth gathers no foot. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Sorry Alexander, I just don't get where you're going with this. Version 0.8 |
27 |
> was released September 27, 2004! There have been 4 major new releases since |
28 |
> then, which include many bug fixes, and new and improved features. 0.8 is old |
29 |
> and busted, 0.9.3 is the new hotness! |
30 |
|
31 |
Who cares? All that matters to portage is, what's in the tree. |
32 |
|
33 |
> Surely I don't need to explain the concept of how software improves with new |
34 |
> development? You're not using GCC 2.95 and kernel 2.2.10 are you? |
35 |
|
36 |
No, because gcc 2.95 isn't the latest stable version in the tree. |
37 |
|
38 |
Alexander Skwar |
39 |
-- |
40 |
The way I understand it, the Russians are sort of a combination of evil and |
41 |
incompetence... sort of like the Post Office with tanks. |
42 |
-- Emo Philips |
43 |
|
44 |
|
45 |
-- |
46 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |