| 1 |
Quoth the Alexander Skwar |
| 2 |
> Darren Kirby <bulliver@×××××××××××.org>: |
| 3 |
> > Quoth the Alexander Skwar |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> >> · maxim wexler <blissfix@×××××.com>: |
| 6 |
> >> >>digg2ogg |
| 7 |
> >> > |
| 8 |
> >> > should be dir2ogg |
| 9 |
> >> |
| 10 |
> >> 0.8 is the latest stable version. Why do you think, that a different |
| 11 |
> >> version should be offered, when you "emerge dir2ogg"? |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > Well, I'm the upstream author, and _I_ think there should be different |
| 14 |
> > (ie: newer) version offered. Good enough? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> No, not good enough, as that doesn't matter at all. All that matters is, |
| 17 |
> what's in the tree. And the latest stable version is 0.8, no matter what |
| 18 |
> you think. The question remains: Why should a different version be offered? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Alexander Skwar |
| 21 |
> -- |
| 22 |
> A closed mouth gathers no foot. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Sorry Alexander, I just don't get where you're going with this. Version 0.8 |
| 25 |
was released September 27, 2004! There have been 4 major new releases since |
| 26 |
then, which include many bug fixes, and new and improved features. 0.8 is old |
| 27 |
and busted, 0.9.3 is the new hotness! |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Surely I don't need to explain the concept of how software improves with new |
| 30 |
development? You're not using GCC 2.95 and kernel 2.2.10 are you? |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Confused by your remarks, |
| 33 |
-d |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org |
| 36 |
"...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected..." |
| 37 |
- Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972 |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives