1 |
Sunday 28 May 2006 21:48 skrev Hemmann, Volker Armin: |
2 |
> > This change could be a |
3 |
> > bugfix. By making your own digest you don't get this bugfix... |
4 |
> |
5 |
> more probably - the mirror corrupted the file. Or someone replaced it with |
6 |
> a hacked package. |
7 |
|
8 |
While that is possible I'm not really sure why you consider it more likely. |
9 |
|
10 |
At least in my case this bug showed when I upgraded from perl-cleaner-1.03 to |
11 |
perl-cleaner-1.03-r1. Those two ebuilds are identical and use the same tar |
12 |
file as source. This means that when I originally (a couple of weeks ago) |
13 |
installed 1.03 the digest fitted the other, smaller tar file, which means |
14 |
that devs has approved both versions of that tar file). It did install |
15 |
successfully (and seemed to work) so it couldn't be too corrupted. |
16 |
|
17 |
So while it is possible that the devs approved a file that shouldn't have been |
18 |
approved, I prefer to think that upstream just did something stupid by |
19 |
upgrading the package without a revision bump.. :) |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Bo Andresen |