From: | John Laremore <onlyonemaxdog@×××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 4.1.1 Problems | ||
Date: | Mon, 29 May 2006 01:10:58 | ||
Message-Id: | BAY116-F36AFAADDDF902239F8B8C4A79D0@phx.gbl | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 4.1.1 Problems by "Bo Ørsted Andresen" |
1 | |
2 | quit fucking email bombing me you ass holes. |
3 | |
4 | |
5 | |
6 | |
7 | From: Bo �rsted Andresen <bo.andresen@××××.dk> Reply-To: gentoo-user@l.g.o To: gentoo-user@l.g.o Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 4.1.1 Problems Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 00:10:25 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from robin.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102]) by bay0-mc2-f10.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 28 May 2006 15:14:51 -0700 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4SMD7KS003610;Sun, 28 May 2006 22:13:07 GMT Received: from cicero2.cybercity.dk (cicero2.cybercity.dk [212.242.40.53])by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4SMALei017832for |
8 | <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Sun, 28 May 2006 22:10:21 GMT Received: from user2.cybercity.dk (user2.cybercity.dk [212.242.41.35])by cicero2.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1DA9244F08for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Mon, 29 May 2006 00:10:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from BA.zlin.dk (port78.ds1-abs.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.227.17])by user2.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB172869D7for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Mon, 29 May 2006 00:10:20 +0200 (CEST) >Sunday 28 May 2006 21:48 skrev Hemmann, Volker Armin: > > > This change could be a > > > bugfix. By making your own digest you don't get this bugfix... > > > > more probably - the mirror corrupted the file. Or someone replaced it with > > a hacked package. > >While that is possible I'm not |
9 | really sure why you consider it more likely. > >At least in my case this bug showed when I upgraded from perl-cleaner-1.03 to >perl-cleaner-1.03-r1. Those two ebuilds are identical and use the same tar >file as source. This means that when I originally (a couple of weeks ago) >installed 1.03 the digest fitted the other, smaller tar file, which means >that devs has approved both versions of that tar file). It did install >successfully (and seemed to work) so it couldn't be too corrupted. > >So while it is possible that the devs approved a file that shouldn't have been >approved, I prefer to think that upstream just did something stupid by >upgrading the package without a revision bump.. :) > >-- >Bo Andresen |
10 | ><< attach3 >> |
11 | |
12 | Join the new Messenger beta now |
13 | |
14 | -- |
15 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
16 | |
17 | |
18 |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 4.1.1 Problems | "Hemmann |
Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 4.1.1 Problems | Jerry McBride <mcbrides9@×××××××.net> |
Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 4.1.1 Problems | Steven Susbauer <stupendoussteve@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 4.1.1 Problems | Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org> |