Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: John Laremore <onlyonemaxdog@×××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 4.1.1 Problems
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 01:10:58
Message-Id: BAY116-F36AFAADDDF902239F8B8C4A79D0@phx.gbl
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 4.1.1 Problems by "Bo Ørsted Andresen"
1
2

quit fucking email bombing me you ass holes.

3
4
5
6
7 From:  Bo �rsted Andresen <bo.andresen@××××.dk>
Reply-To:  gentoo-user@l.g.o
To:  gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject:  Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 4.1.1 Problems
Date:  Mon, 29 May 2006 00:10:25 +0200
MIME-Version:  1.0
Received:  from robin.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102]) by bay0-mc2-f10.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 28 May 2006 15:14:51 -0700
Received:  from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4SMD7KS003610;Sun, 28 May 2006 22:13:07 GMT
Received:  from cicero2.cybercity.dk (cicero2.cybercity.dk [212.242.40.53])by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4SMALei017832for
8 <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Sun, 28 May 2006 22:10:21 GMT
Received:  from user2.cybercity.dk (user2.cybercity.dk [212.242.41.35])by cicero2.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1DA9244F08for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Mon, 29 May 2006 00:10:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received:  from BA.zlin.dk (port78.ds1-abs.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.227.17])by user2.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB172869D7for <gentoo-user@l.g.o>; Mon, 29 May 2006 00:10:20 +0200 (CEST)
>Sunday 28 May 2006 21:48 skrev Hemmann, Volker Armin:
> > > This change could be a
> > > bugfix. By making your own digest you don't get this bugfix...
> >
> > more probably - the mirror corrupted the file. Or someone replaced it with
> > a hacked package.
>
>While that is possible I'm not
9 really sure why you consider it more likely.
>
>At least in my case this bug showed when I upgraded from perl-cleaner-1.03 to
>perl-cleaner-1.03-r1. Those two ebuilds are identical and use the same tar
>file as source. This means that when I originally (a couple of weeks ago)
>installed 1.03 the digest fitted the other, smaller tar file, which means
>that devs has approved both versions of that tar file). It did install
>successfully (and seemed to work) so it couldn't be too corrupted.
>
>So while it is possible that the devs approved a file that shouldn't have been
>approved, I prefer to think that upstream just did something stupid by
>upgrading the package without a revision bump.. :)
>
>--
>Bo Andresen
10

><< attach3 >>

11

12


Join the new Messenger beta now
13
14 --
15 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
16
17
18

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 4.1.1 Problems "Hemmann
Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 4.1.1 Problems Jerry McBride <mcbrides9@×××××××.net>
Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 4.1.1 Problems Steven Susbauer <stupendoussteve@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 4.1.1 Problems Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org>