| 1 |
Am 09/01/15 um 03:37 schrieb Dale: |
| 2 |
> Jc García wrote: |
| 3 |
>> > 2015-01-08 11:02 GMT-06:00 behrouz khosravi <bz.khosravi@×××××.com>: |
| 4 |
>>> >> Hi. I was wondering that is it predictable that when qt5 and plasma 5 will |
| 5 |
>>> >> be unmasked? |
| 6 |
>>> >> |
| 7 |
>> > Keep an eye on the bug-tracker for the unmasking of qt5[1] or hang |
| 8 |
>> > around the #gentoo-qt irc channel[2] , there you can get first hand |
| 9 |
>> > information, |
| 10 |
>> > |
| 11 |
>> > It's work that needs to be done, and usually developers work on their |
| 12 |
>> > free time and bugs might keep arising, so prediction doesn't work. |
| 13 |
>> > |
| 14 |
>> > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454132 |
| 15 |
>> > [2] irc://irc.gentoo.org/gentoo-qt |
| 16 |
>> > |
| 17 |
>> > |
| 18 |
> On this topic, has anyone used qt5 and plasma 5 yet? Is it at least |
| 19 |
> workable? I ask because I may give it a try unless people think it is |
| 20 |
> to early yet. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I have encountered several Gentooers in #gentoo-qt and #gentoo-kde that |
| 23 |
use it already. It seems to work, thought not perfectly. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Some Ubuntu-using friends of mine use Qt5 on a daily basis without |
| 26 |
problems, I wondered: what's different in Gentoo? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
cheers |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Michael |
Archives